Preparing for P5 changes and v1.8
Posted by mholmes on 24 Apr 2008 in Activity log
CT sent me a link to the new, more precise specification of @facs
, which aims to prevent my generalized usage of it as linking anything to a facsimile element. @facs
will now be limited to
"groups elements corresponding with all or part of an image,
because they contain an alternative representation of it, typically
but not necessarily a transcription of it." That's still pretty vague, but it's intended, I think, to exclude annotation. IMT needs to change to reflect this.
After some consideration, this is what I think should happen:
- Version 1.8 should add a new checkbox/boolean to the category properties, specifying that this category is transcriptional in nature (vague, but so is the above spec!). I haven't yet figured out a way to store this information in the
<rendition>
element of the TEI file. Perhaps I should just add an@facs
attribute to the<rendition>
tag, pointing at the<facsimile>
element? - Where this boolean is set, the annotations should be associated with the area using the
@facs
attribute; otherwise, the@corresp
attribute should be used.
If this proves too complicated for the moment, a quick solution would simply be to switch from @facs
to @corresp
.