More discussions of IMT 2
Posted by mholmes on 31 Aug 2009 in Activity log
Met with MT and discussed DI's wishlist for the EMiC markup tool and publication platform. Following this, I sent a long email to both explaining my take on the situation (that the markup tool and the publication engine are separate projects and ought not really to be connected, and that I'd be less likely to be much involved in a publication engine). The feature list is shaking down. One key aspect that jumps out is the requirement for polygonal zones, which precludes the use of the standard FACS module in TEI; we may need to lobby for polygonal areas, and/or go back to SVG.