Edited by David Lindley
Introduction
A Challenge at Tilt formed part of the extensive celebrations of the wedding of Frances Howard, daughter of Thomas, Earl of Suffolk, to Robert Carr, the King’s favourite, created Earl of Somerset at the time of the marriage. The wedding night, 26 December 1613, was celebrated with Campion’s Somerset Masque, and on 27 December the first part of Challenge – the challenge itself – was issued. There is no direct indication of where this took place, though the second Cupid’s statement that he will bring tilters ‘into the lists before this palace’ suggests that it might have been delivered indoors at a banquet as Prince Henry’s challenge had been three years earlier (see Barriers, Introduction). It is not impossible however, that it could have been uttered in the tiltyard, where ‘the King, Prince, bridegroom and others ran at the ring’ on 27 December (Masque Archive, Challenge, 12). Two days later, on 29 December, Jonson’s Irish Masque received its first performance, and then, on 1 January 1614, the second part of the Challenge, the actual tournament, was contested in the tiltyard at Whitehall, watched from the permanent gallery overlooking the tiltyard by the King and Queen, accompanied by the ambassadors of Spain and the Arch-Duke with their ladies (Finet, Finetti philoxenis, 1656, 16). The King ordered a repeat performance of the Irish Masque on 3 January, and the following night the couple were entertained by the Lord Mayor, when at least one play, and Middleton’s lost Masque of Cupids, were performed. The celebrations were rounded out by the Gray’s Inn offering of The Masque of Flowers, sponsored by Francis Bacon, on 6 January 1614.
The circumstances of this marriage were highly controversial, and are discussed in detail in Lindley (1993), 77–122. Frances Howard’s marriage to the third Earl of Essex in 1605 (celebrated by Hymenaei) had not been consummated at the time, and the Earl had departed abroad on his educational travels. After his return Frances Howard rejected his advances, and at some point fell in love with Robert Carr. She and her family, with the King’s support, in 1613 instituted proceedings for the annulment of her marriage on the grounds of Essex’s impotence. The nullity was finally achieved only after the King intervened to add extra commissioners to those originally appointed, and the scandalized gossip which attended the proceedings was intensified when news of the proposed marriage with Carr emerged. Some of the opposition to Frances’s remarriage was political rather than moral, since by this alliance with the King’s favourite the Howard family consolidated their already massive political power. The Challenge at Tilt was intended to put on public show ‘a general reconcilement made between my lord of Howard and my lords of Pembroke, Southampton, etc. in this conjuncture’, as John More wrote (HMC Downshire, 4.252). The Agent of Savoy, however, reported that ‘many lords have been invited to a certain tilt, but many of them have refused because they are relatives of the Earl of Essex, and others have excused themselves, not being part of this [Howard] faction’ (Orrell, 1979b, 80). Thomas Howard himself, appealing for Edward Sackville to be added to the list of tilters despite his being in disgrace for having killed Lord Bruce of Kinloss in a duel, hoped that the King would ‘give him leave to do honour to his cousin’s marriage, when there is so few that will be willing to take his place if he go out’ (PRO, SP 14/75/37, fol. 64). In the event, as the list of tilters, probably in the hand of William Camden, in BL, MS Harley 5176, fol. 217 (Masque Archive, Challenge, 1) indicates, he did take part.
If some chose to express their disapproval of the match, many others fell over themselves to shower presents upon the highly influential Robert Carr. They were to be discomfited when, in 1615, evidence began to emerge of the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury in the Tower at the time of the marriage. The subsequent trials and disgrace of Robert Carr and his wife meant that Jonson expunged all mention of the occasions of his entertainments for Frances Howard’s two marriages from the folio of 1616.
The device Jonson invented was a graceful one, based on the myth of Eros and Anteros – a myth he used again in his late entertainment, Love’s Welcome at Bolsover. In the first part of the masque two Cupids dispute over which is the ‘true’ god of Love. Whereas in the debate of Truth and Opinion in the barriers at Hymenaei it is clearly implied that the first has the better case, which is confirmed in the final outcome, here there is no obvious hierarchy, and the resolution provided after the tilting reconciles the two Cupids as equals. This is both emblematically and politically appropriate to the occasion.
It is perhaps significant that, unlike Campion, or Chapman in his 1614 poem, Andromeda Liberata, Jonson makes no effort, either in Challenge or Irish, to confront directly the gossip and rumour which attended the marriage. Though he wrote a poem to Robert Carr (omitted from the 1616 folio), and allowed an earlier poem to Thomas Howard to remain in his published Epigrams, he seems to have had little affection for the Howard family, and was certainly ready to celebrate the changed political situation that resulted from Somerset’s fall in The Golden Age Restored (1616).
For more details about tilting and barriers see the Introduction to Hymenaei. As it turned out, this was to be the last Jacobean tournament presented with the full apparatus of speeches and pageants. Though tilts continued to be held, the fashion for them was waning. (See Young, 1987, 37–42.)
The text was first published in the 1616 folio. It is notably short on supplementary detail. Perhaps this is a consequence of the excision of the occasion, but stage directions in the Barriers for Prince Henry are similarly sparse, suggesting that Jonson was not interested in presenting any more than his own verbal contribution to occasions of this kind. There is no clear evidence for the nature of the printer’s copy, but it probably was a scribal transcript.
A CHALLENGE AT TILT, AT A MARRIAGE
disguised as servants].
SECOND CUPID
By what law or necessity? Pray you come back. 5
SECOND CUPID
How!
FIRST CUPID
Ha!
FIRST CUPID
[To the audience] Beware, young ladies, of this impostor; and mothers,
look to your daughters and nieces: a false Cupid is abroad. It is I that am the
not to put off, but to conceal my deity, and in this habit of a servant to attend
nuptials, to make all his endeavours and actions more gracious and lovely.
SECOND CUPID
[To the audience] He tells my tale! He tells my tale, and pretends
to my act! It was I that did this for the bride: I am the true Love, and both
not perceive it? Do I not look liker a Cupid than he? Am I not more a child? 30
Ladies, have none of you a picture of me in your bosom? Is the remembrance
me to you! If I were naked, you would know me better. No relic of love left in
an old bosom here? What should I do?
my bow, and her looks ready to be loosed thence, like my shafts? Had I not
untie my mother’s, wherein all the joys and delights of love were woven?
FIRST CUPID
And did not I bring on the blushing bridegroom to taste those joys, 45
and made him think all stay a torment? Did I not shoot myself into him like a
power to have kept the night alive in contention with day, and made the
morning never wished for? Was there a curl in his hair that I did not sport
touch attempt? But his words, were they not feathered from my wings, and
flew in singing at her ears, like arrows tipped with gold?
my powers in her, as thy form is from me. But, that this royal and honoured 55
lists before this palace ten knights armed, who shall undertake, against all
that lady (whom it is my ambition to serve), that that love is the most true 60
and perfect that still waiteth on the woman and is the servant of that sex.
FIRST CUPID
I take only them; and in exchange give mine, to answer and punish
valour and beauty; and that no love can come near either truth or perfection
but what is manly, and derives his proper dignity from thence.
SECOND CUPID
It is agreed.
and to entertain your thoughts till the day, may the court hourly present you
with delicate and fresh objects to beget on you pretty and pleasing fancies.
turn into blood, to make your dreams the clearer and your imaginations the
finer. So they departed. 75
and make a spring smile i’your faces, which must have looked like winter 80
true figure, as I use to reign and revel in your fancies, tickling your soft
ears with my feathers and laying little straws about your hearts to kindle
yours under this yoke, my bow, or, if they would not bend, whipping your
no name with you? Have I lost all reputation, or, what is less, opinion, by 90
me for sovereignty? Well, I will chastise you, ladies, believe it; you shall feel 95
my displeasure for this, and I will be mighty in it. Think not to have those
chambers for me; ten doors locked between you and me hereafter, and I will
allow none of you a key. When I come abroad you shall petition me and I will
than I will do upon you. Trust me. Ha! What’s this?
being challenger, and so the precedency, you think? I see you are resolved to
try your title by arms, then? You will stand to be the right Cupid still? How
now! What ails you that you answer not? Are you turned a statue upon my
appearance? Or did you hope I would not appear, and that hope has deceived
you? 110
soever I present myself, thou wilt seem to be the same? Not so much as my
of my mother to draw it? The very number of my companions emulated, and
others’ valour, not your own, and you must know you can bring no person
hither to strengthen your side but we can produce an equal. Be it Persuasion
Mercury here to charm against her, who gives all lovers their true and masculine 120
encounter them, three more manly perfections, and much more powerful
in working for love. Child, you are all the ways of winning too weak; there
is no thinking, either with your honour or discretion kept safe, to continue 125
on a strife wherein you are already vanquished. Yield, be penitent early, and
confess it.
FIRST CUPID
Why, what have you done, or won?
SECOND CUPID
It is enough for me, who was called out to this trial, that I have
not lost, or that my side is not vanquished.
HYMEN
Come, you must yield both: this is neither contention for you, nor time 145
fit to contend. There is another kind of tilting would become love better than
this: to meet lips for lances, and crack kisses instead of staves; which there is
no beauty here, I presume, so young but can fancy, nor so tender but would
the president of these solemnities, tell you something of your own story, and
his birth proved a child of excellent beauty, and right worthy his mother,
who nursed him, became extremely solicitous for him, and were impelled
but that they had not enough considered or looked into the nature of the
infant, which indeed was desirous of a companion only; for though love, and 160
the true, might be born of Venus single and alone, yet he could not thrive
forth a brother to him and name him Anteros; that with reciprocal affection
birth. Since when your natures are that either of you, looking upon the other, 165
thrive, and by your mutual respects and interchange of ardour flourish and
prosper; whereas if the one be deficient or wanting to the other it fares worse
with both. This is the love that Hymen requires, without which no marriage
is happy: when the contention is not who is the true love, but (being both
palm. This is a strife wherein you both win, and begets a concord worthy
all honourable friends and servants of love, affect the like peace, and depart
fortunes. And may this royal court never know more difference in humours,
or these well-graced nuptials more discord in affections, than what they
presently feel, and may ever avoid.