MARCH 30, 1875. 995
            
            
            
            Mr. SCHULTZ wished to have some information in regard to treaties generally in the North-West.
               There was very little to be obtained from the report of the Minister of the Interior.
               The treaty negotiated at Qu'Appelle Lake occupied several days and many matters were
               brought up. It was understood that dis- satisfactions were expressed by nearly every
               one of these Indians with the Hudson's Bay Company's rule in the North-West, and fear
               was expressed that the company or its officers exercised undue influence over the
               Government. If such were the  fact, it was a very important matter for the Government
               to keep in view in making choice of officials in the North-West and in the Government
               of that territory.  
               
 
            
            
            
            Hon. Mr. LAIRD said the objections which the Indians took to the Hudson Bay Company were very fully
               stated in reports published in all the newspapers of Manitoba and in some newspapers
               in the Eastern Provinces. A reporter accompanied the commissioners and reported the
               objections taken by the Indians and the replies thereto which satisfied them in regard
               to the treaty. These reports had been published so fully through the press that he
               did not think it necessary to incorporate them in his report to the House. 
               
 
            
            
            Mr. SMITH (Selkirk) said the objection referred to was in regard to the  reserves held by the
               Hudson's Bay Company under the provisions of the surrender of the territory. Otherwise
               there was very little fault found but it might be interesting to the House to know
               that a  speech delivered by the hon. member for Lisgar, in which the Hudson's Bay
               Company were not spoken of in the most complimentary terms, had been translated into
               the Indian language and distributed among the Indians.  
               
 
            
            
            Mr. SCHULTZ said the hon. member had misconceived, to say the least of it, the objections raised
               by the Indians on the occasion referred to. These objections were simply the distrust
               engendered by their long experience in dealing with the Hudson's Bay Company's officers,
               and, 
               
               
               
               if his information was correct, that distrust was very strongly expressed day after
               day. With regard to the alleged translation of his (Mr. SCHULTZ) speech, if the statement
               were true the translation must have been done by the Hudson's Bay Company themselves.
               It was a very unlikely story, however, inasmuch as there was not in the whole of the
               North- West a font of type capable of printing a  document of that kind. 
               
 
            
            
            Mr. SMITH said he had been informed on a very good authority that such a document was circulated
               among the Indians.  The peace and quietness which prevailed in the North-West was
               sufficient evidence  of the good relations which existed between the Indians and the
               Hudson's Bay Company's officers.