Public Offices document.
Minutes (6), Enclosures (transcribed) (1), Marginalia (1).
This document contains mentions of Indigenous Peoples. The authors of these documents
often perpetuate a negative perspective of Indigenous Peoples and it is important
to look critically at these mentions. They sometimes use terminology that is now considered
hurtful and offensive. To learn more about modern terminology pertaining to Indigenous
Peoples, Indigenous ways of knowing, and decolonization, please refer to the Glossary of terms.
Shepherd writes to Labouchere saying he received Ball’s letter about the Reciprocity Treaty. He discusses some conditions of the Reciprocity
Treaty and that Her Majesty’s Government desires a report from Simpson before the conversation progresses.
The minutes question whether the HBC can request sole rights to coast and river fishing.
Enclosed is a draft from Elliot to Shepherd questioning whether the HBC has the power to reserve fishing rights in certain areas of the Island.
I have the honour to acknowledge the receipt of Mr Ball's letter
dated Downing Street 15th Instant enclosing Copy of [a] letter
addressed to the Colonial Office by direction of the Earl of Clarendon,
transmitting Copy of a Dispatch from Her Majesty's Minister at
Washington relative to the extension of the Reciprocity Treaty with the
United States to Vancouver's Island, which in accordance with his
request I have laid before the Directors of the Hudson's Bay Company.
In reply, I have the honour to state that at present thethe Directors
of the Hudson's Bay Company are not aware of any objection to the
acceptance by Her Majesty's Government of the counter Proposition that
Mr Crampton expects will be put forward by the American Government;
provided due care be taken that the right of fishing reciprocally
conceded be restricted to sea fishing, and that the right of salmon
fishing whether in bays, creeks, or along the coast generally, as
well as in rivers, and the mouths of rivers, be reserved to the Hudson's
Bay Company in the territory held under the exclusive Licence of Trade,
Why?
and also that it be understood that the said Treaty will not be
considered as giving any pretext to American Citizens to trade with the
Indians for Furs, or other articles.
At the same time I have to remark that, before giving a definite
answer, it would be satisfactorysatisfactory to the Directors to have a Report on
the subject from Sir George Simpson who has visited the North West Coast
of America, and whose opinion on the subject would be extremely
valuable.
I propose to communicate with Sir George Simpson, who is at present
in Canada, by the first opportunity, and would respectfully request that
no steps be taken in the matter until his reply be received, which may
be expected in course of post.
I have the honour to be Sir
Your mo: obedient Servant
John Shepherd
DepyGovr
Mr Ball
I am quite at a loss to know on what grounds the H.B.C. require to have
the right of coast & river fishing on the NW coast of Nth Amca
secured to them in the event of a treaty. Their license gives
them the right of exclusive trading with the Indians in that region, but
gives them nothing else. I would by no means urge on a controversy with
them, but when these pretensions are put forward it seems almost
necessary to ask the grounds on which they rest, lest silence should
hereafter be taken for consent?
Mr Labouchere
I agree with Mr Merivale. It is quite a separate question whether
the right of salmon fishing &c should be extended to the Americans and
the claim here raised that it shd be reserved to the H.B.Cy.
The H.B.C. can only speak in this matter as representing British
Interests in that part of the world—which is practically pretty much
the case. I see no objection to this reference to the Governor of V.C. Island for an opinion before a decision is come to.
Documents enclosed with the main document (transcribed)
Draft, Elliot to Shepherd, 4 April 1856, asking on what grounds
the company expected to have the right of coast and river fishing
reserved to them.
4th April /56
Sir,
In answer to your letter of the 20th Ulto I am directed by Mr
Secretary Labouchere to state that he shall be happy to receive the
proposed report from Sir George Simpson on the extension of the
Reciprocity Treaty with the United States to Vancouver's Island, but that
in the meanwhile he will thank you to inform him on what groundsgrounds you
require to have the right of Coast and River fishing on the North West
Coast of America secured to the Hudson's Bay Company in the event of the
extension of the Treaty.