I think that on this subject there has been a great deal of
mismanagement and erroneous judgment
in the Colony. One Indian,
after being convicted of murdering another in
Nov. 1861, had his
captial punishment remitted, and we need not be surprised to find
that another Indian has now committed a like crime. The Governor has
absolutely set him free with no punishment at all, and has published
an address to all the Indians telling them so, although he warns them
that on the next occasion death will be inflicted.
The reason for mercy in both cases seems to have been that it has
been the practice of the Indians, whenever one murder has occurred,
to retaliate on any member whom they can catch of the offending
Tribe, which obviously must lead to an endless series of murders and
countermurders. This I should have thought precisely the reason for
not showing mercy, but for making the Indians aware,
by by making an
example as well as by exhortation, that this abominable practice can
no longer be suffered now that they are under British rule. The
Indians are quite capable of understanding the necessity of
conforming to the laws of their Sovereign; and I have myself heard
from the lips of the first Judge who administered justice amongst
them at Minesota how readily they understood and obeyed the American
law on this point. Indeed you will find that one of the injured
Chiefs at
Vancouver began by asking whether he could get any justice
from our authorities. If they refuse it under the name of showing
clemency, it is no wonder that these poor Indians should continue to
exact their own retribution for the slaughter of their relatives.
I
I think that something should be said to strengthen
Governor
Kennedy's professed intention of inflicting the punishment of death
on the occasion of any future Indian murder, and to prevent a
repetition of a course which seems to me very little consistent with
the real interests of humanity.
I entirely agree in the spirit of the foregoing remarks. Whether in
the first instance the extreme penalty
sh have been carried into
execution is a matter in which I should have been willing to rely a
good deal on an able Governor, like
M Kennedy, much accustomed to
[Aursits?].
But his absolute release seems to me incomprehensible.
Write to Governor that the importance of giving
the Indians to
understand the necessity of conforming to Christian laws must not for
a moment be lost sight of: & that I should wish some further
explanation of the reasons which induced him to set this Prisoner at
liberty.
That I have great confidence in his judgment & his experience in the
management of Criminals, but that I should have thought, even if he
had felt it was right so far to defer to the Judge & Jury as not to
carry the extreme penalty into execution, he would have inflicted
some punishment, exemplary in itself, & likely to be regarded as an
earnest of the more complete execution of our Law in future cases.