It appears to me that there is no ground for this claim. The
fees are not "chargeable with the salaries of officers" w
are to be what the Gov thinks just. And the closing words of
the Act seem to imply that "the Commiss & other officers"
not "the C.J. Commiss & other officers" were to participate in them.
Accordingly the Gov has never assigned any salary to the
C.J. probably because he did not think it just.
But as obs by the Col Sec & A.G. a subsequent Act,
passed while the C.J. was not in the receipt of fees, &, it may
be presumed, on the understanding that he was not to receive
them gave him a salary of £1200 a year evidently, I sh
say, in full of all claims on the public. Therefore I sh
say the claim sh be negatived.