Public Offices document [Sender not known.] to Merivale, Herman 27 May 1859, CO 60:5, no. 5429, 521.
Abstract
Public Offices document.
Minutes (3).
Murdoch and Rogers argue against a proposal by Haliburton, who Blackwood minutes parenthetically as (Sam Slick), to privatize the Sale of all Crown Lands in the Colonies of British Columbia and VanCouvers Island through the Canada Agency Association Limited.Elliot minutes to inform Murdoch and Rogers that H.M. Govt has no intention to transfer to any private Agency the function of disposing of the public lands in
British Columbia.
We have to acknowledge Mr Elliots letter of 25th
instant, enclosing an application from Mr Halliburton, on
behalf of the "Canada Agency Association Limited," to be
appointed Agents for the Sale of all Crown Lands in the
Colonies of British Columbia and VanCouvers Island.
2. The Association propose that they should be appointed
sole Agents for the Sale of Land inin British Columbia & Van
Couvers Island at an upset price to be fixed by Government,
that they should be furnished with all Maps, Surveys and
Official information on the subject for the use of intending
Emigrants, that they should appoint an Agent to conduct
Sales for them in the Colony, and that, as their remuneration,
they should receive a commission on all Sales effected by them.
The advantages to the public of such an arrangement are not
very clearly stated, but it is implied that it would
"expedite && facilitate the Sale of Land," and it is pointed
out that it would relieve H.M. Government from the burden,
responsibility and expense of supplying information and
conducting subsequent negociations. Allusion is also made to
the proposed establishment of communication between Canada
and British Columbia, but it is not stated, and is not easy
to see, in what way this bears on the subject.
3. In Mr Elliots letter it is pointed out that the
plan of selling in this Country the public Lands of B.
Columbiahashas been disallowed. This decision is of course
conclusive as to so much of the present application as
relates to the Sale of Land by the Association itself.
All that remains, therefore, to be considered is the
proposal that the sale of Land in the Colony should be
transferred from the Governor and his subordinate Officers
to an Agent appointed by the Association. The mere
statement of this proposal seems a sufficient answer to it.
On what ground could H.M. Government transfer from their
own responsible Officers to the Agent ofof an irresponsible
and unknown trading Company one of the most important
functions of Government? It could not be said that a
Trading Company is better fitted for the discharge of
such duties, or that they would act in a purer or more
disinterested manner, or that their operations would
conciliate more public confidence, or that they would be
conducted with greater economy. In all these respects
it may be safely asserted that the management of the Land
Department by the Crown would be better and more satisfactory
than by a Company, and even the saving of trouble andand
responsibility to the Government, which is the only
inducement put forward by the Company, is a delusion, for
the Government could not divest itself of responsibility
for the Acts of the body to whom it had entrusted its own duties,
though it might have divested itself of the power to control them.
4. It is of course obvious that the Association
would not have proposed such an arrangement unless they had
expected to make money by it, and it must be borne in mind
thatthat every shilling they received would be so much taken from
the Colonial Revenue. It may also be assumed that the
Association, keeping their commercial interests in view,
would sell land not with reference to the requirements of
the public or the interests of the Colony, but with
reference to their own Commission & profits, that such a state
of things would produce resentment, complaint and resistance
is too natural to be doubted, and the Local Government, in
addition to its necessary difficulties, would be called on
to protect a monopoly whichwhich they could not approve and over
whose proceedings they could exercise no authority. It is
not easy to conceive a more embarrassing position in which
to place it.
5. Upon the whole we cannot recommend a compliance
with this proposal. We are unable to conjecture any public
advantage, though we can foresee much public damage, which
would result from it. We do not know who are the members
of the Association nor do we think it necessary to enquireenquire,
although if there were any chances of the proposal being
entertained that is a point which would require consideration.
This is a powerful report and effectually disposes
of the plan of investing a private Company with the duty
of selling the public land in B. Columbia.
I think that the best practical course will be to state that
Sir E.B. Lytton has had before him the proposal made by the
Association, but to inform them that it is not the intention of
H.M. Govt to transfer to any private Agency the function
of disposing of the public lands in British Columbia.