M Fortescue
I agree with
M Blackwood that it would be a very proper step
to lead the Em Comm to make public the attractions of
Vanc.
I. as far as they justly can. But as to setting up one
nationality against another—English against American—I think
the time is past for such policy, if it was ever good at all.
We are entering on a new & very singular place in our
British-North-American history. Along the whole of the line
49 from
Red River to
Vanc. I. inclusive, the American
population of the prairies is pressing into our territory, &
will do so more & more as it presents the double attraction of
gold & game. These wandering people are beyond our control.
They will absorb us, or we shall absorb them. The tiny
[dishlots?]
of Emigration we might send out by sea would vanish altogether
in the compound. What then is there to prevent
our provinces
from becoming Americanized? No remedies that I know of, except
those of better laws & better society and greater freedom from
taxation. And—strange as it may appear to those who remember
the days of
Lord Durham &
Lord Sydenham—
influence. The ancient enthusiasm of the Yankees for their
institutions has had some shrewd knocks of late. The license of
California, the Indian massacres of
Oregon, & the civil war of
Kansas have done more for British influence than any
political devices of ours could have achieved. The change may
be very temporary: but we must profit by it while it lasts, &
not be jealous of the immigration it helps to produce. In the
mean time, whoever may ultimately profit thereby, it is
encouraging to receive such accounts
of the natural capabilities
of
Vancouver's Island. It seems to be a very attractive region:
& likely to prosper greatly, if the settlers can be secure
against the Indians: at present (thanks to
Hudson's Bay Company
management) these seem very tractable.