Despatch to London.
Minutes (7), Other documents (2), Marginalia (1).
This document contains mentions of Indigenous Peoples. The authors of these documents
often perpetuate a negative perspective of Indigenous Peoples and it is important
to look critically at these mentions. They sometimes use terminology that is now considered
hurtful and offensive. To learn more about modern terminology pertaining to Indigenous
Peoples, Indigenous ways of knowing, and decolonization, please refer to the Glossary of terms.
Douglas writes to Newcastle to report on the investigation into the wreck of the William and the death of McIntosh. He discusses, among other things, suspicions of foul play, Swanston’s imprisonment for contempt of court, and the colony’s lack of military force.
The minutes debate at length Douglas’s legal authority, or not, to establish a Vice Admiralty Court.
The first of the two documents included in the file is a draft reply from Grey to Douglas, which praises Douglas’s investigation into the wreck of the William; the second is a draft letter from the Colonial Office to Colvile, with minutes, on the suitability of Cameron for Supreme Court judge.
I beg to inform your Grace that I have been lately engaged with an
investigation into the causes, which led to the wreck of the Brig
"William", bound from San Francisco to this Port, and to the death of the Master John McIntosh, who was drowned in attempting to land from the
wreck while the mate and all the seamen landed in safety.
That disaster is said to have occurred near Barclay Sound, on the
west coast of Vancouver's Island, in the night of the first of January
last.
The
2. The investigation occupied several days, and after a patient
enquiry into all the circumstances, from the commencement of the voyage,
to its ill fated termination, in the loss of the vessel, and death of
the Master, we could not discover any grounds of complaint against the
seamen; as the fact but too evidently appeared, that the Master was a
person of intemperate habits and that the ship had been lost entirely
through his misconduct.
The evidence proves that he was often unconscious from
intoxication, that he was in that state when the vessel ran ashore, on
Vancouver's Island, and his death in attempting to land from the wreck,
appears to have been the effect of the same cause. A report of this
case will be forwarded as soon as I have time to get it drawn up.
3. I would not have troubled your Grace with any remarks on this
case at present had it not been for the extraordinary conduct of Mr
Robert Swanston, the Consignee of the Brig "William"William, who showed a
disposition to set Her Majesty's authorities at naught, and to treat the
Vice Admiralty Court of this Colony, with contempt, as I will proceed to
show.
4. On the wreck of the Brig "William," the crew travelled under
the direction of the natives, towards this place and after much
privation and hardship arrived here in a state of great distress.
5. I relieved their immediate wants and addressed a note to Mr Swanston on behalf of the crew, advising him that payment of the wages,
due for the time they had served on board the "William" should be made
to them, on the part of the owners. That note produced no effect, as he
refused to pay the wages due, and there being no proof that he was a
party interested in the ownership of the vessel I could not advise the
seamen to have recourse to legal proceedings for the recovery of their
claims.
6. On the 23rd January Ireceived
received a letter from Mr Swanston
applying for an enquiry into the causes which led to the wreck of the
William, and to the death of Captain McIntosh, and the reason given,
as the grounds of that application, was to use his own words; "as he had
heard rumours which led him to imagine that there may have been foul
play," and moreover mentioning that the crew of the "William" were on
the point of leaving the Colony.
Mr Swanston was informed of those arrangements, through my
private Secretary Mr Golledge, on the 25th January, and that the
Court would proceed with the proposed investigation as soon, as he
produced the information referred to in his letter.
A
8. A note in reply was received from Mr Swanston, declining to
appear unless I addressed him under my own signature, and not through a
secretary.
9. The court was nevertheless opened on the 26th of January last, as before appointed, and proceeded to examine the mate and seamen
of the Brig "William", as hereinbefore mentioned in the commencement of
this letter.
Mr Swanston did not however appear when called upon for his
evidence; a Writ was therefore issued, on the same day requiring his
appearance before the Court. He still failing to appear I caused a writ
of attachment, to issue on the 28th of January and he was taken into custody on the 30th, and committed to Jail, until the Court met in the afternoon of the same day, when
he was found in contempt, and sentenced to pay a fine of 50 with costs, or in default
of payment to
be imprisoned as the Law directs. The fine was immediately paid, andthe
the young man was discharged from custody on easier terms than I should
think it proper to grant on any similar occasion hereafter, when parties
either through folly or disaffection, attempt to oppose the Executive
authorities in the lawful discharge of their duties.
and appeared to act as his legal adviser, but the young man, was so
clearly in fault that very little could be said in his defence.
At the close of the proceedings Mr Swanston entered a viva
vocé protest against them, in presence of the Court, which I should
probably have considered, and treated as a fresh contempt, but not being
quite certain about the propriety of that course, I took no further
proceedings, and adjourned the Court.
11. This I am happy to say is the only instance, wherein the
authority of Her Majesty's Government, has been openly resisted, since
the Colony wasfounded
founded. The offender is not a Colonist, and has no real
property in the Colony, being merely agent for a mercantile House in San
Francisco, from whence his imports are exclusively received, and to
which his returns are remitted. He therefore enjoys the protection of
the Laws, without contributing in any manner to the expenses of
Government or to the improvement of the Colony, and like many others of
the same class, is a good citizen of the United States, in California,
though he assumes the garb of a British Subject in Vancouver's Island.
12. Having no military force at my disposal and there being only a
single Constable at this place, such persons suppose they may insult the
Government with impunity.
The Governor is empowered by his Commission to appoint Judges and
Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer.
No Governor is authorised to appoint a Vice Admiralty Court.
At the same time the Governor of Vancouver's island is a Vice
Admiral; that is, although a Civilian, he holds a Commission as Vice
Admiral from
the High Court of Admiralty, and that Commission invests
him with very extensive duties and powers.
I annex an old Commission of a Vice Admiral which will better
explain those duties and powers.
I remember a case which is exactly similar to the present one.
Some year or two after St Helena was made over to the Crown, that is
about 1837, Major General Middlemore the Governor being at a loss how to
dispose of some shipping cases, was advised that he might establish a
Vice Admiralty Court. Having acted upon that advice, a question arose
as to the
legality of his proceeding. Jenner, Queen's Advocate, would
not say that the proceeding was illegal; but measures were immediately
taken for establishing a Court of Vice Admiralty.
Such a Court can only be created by virtue of an Order in Council,
for which the Admiralty apply to the Council office
upon the
recommendation of the Secretary of State. But as the Admiralty would
not, perhaps, provide a salary for the Judge, the Secretary of State
would, before he made such a recommendation, have to consider whether
there is any properly qualified Colonial functionary, to whom the duties
of a Judge might be entrusted.
This minute would not be complete, if I omitted to state that I
perfectly remember a letter which the late Lord Stowell wrote to Lord
Liverpool more than forty years ago, warning him that certain Vice
Admiralty Courts which a Governor had estd in the West Indies were
illegal, and that if the
proceedings of those courts should be brought
under his (Lord Stowell's notice, nothing could save the Govr from
the pains and penalties which he had incurred.
Mr Peel
I am inclined to think that if the Govr of Vanc. I. possesses an
admiralty commission similar to that annexed by Mr Smith, the words
opposite to which I have marked 3 crosses in pencil will warrant the
proceeding he has taken in this case.
He might however, if he had been acquainted with the law, have
proceeded in a much simpler way, as the stat. 12 & 13 Vict. c. 96 would
have enabled him to treat this as matter for the cognizance of the
ordinary court of the colony.
I can see no reason why Vice Admy courts should not be
established in every colony, Vancouver's Island inclusive: and believe
that it would be better, on the whole, that the Governor himself should
be the Judge of such Court, than that there should be none.
There is now before us a Vanc. Id ordinance "for establishing a
civil court." In the covering dispatch the Govr earnestly requests
that a civil judge should be sent out to him—a "professional lawyer."
This seems to me
hopeless. In the first place there is no regular
legislature in Vanc. Id at all: everything is as yet provisional:
in the next place it would be impossible to provide an adequate salary.
I therefore believe it would be best to apply to the Admiralty for
the establisht of a Court with the Governor as Judge. This however
must wait for the decision of the other pending legal questions
regarding the Island: and in the mean time, Govr Douglas should be
informed to the best of our ability of his present legal powers in this
respect.
Draft, Colonial Office to A. Colvile, Hudson's Bay Company, 28 July 1854, asking for an opinion as to the suitability of David Cameron for the office of judge of the supreme court, and enclosing extracts of a memorial
protesting his appointment.
Minutes by CO staff
This draft is resubmitted with the addition desired by Sir G. Grey.
Sir George is, I suppose, aware that this draft was intended only for
the Governor of the Company in London & that we proposed writing
to the Governor in the colony on the points on which we are now
asking for infn from Mr Colville [Colvile].