In connexion with the conversation we had the honor to have with
your Lordship a few days since, on the subject of the Island of
San Juan, we now beg, in accordance with the suggestion of Your
Lordship, to submit our observations on the subject in the form
of a written communication and in our Character of
Representatives of the Canadian Government.
Your Lordship is aware that the 146th Section of the "British
North America Act, 1867" makes provision for the admission into
the Dominion of Canada of New Foundland, Prince Edward Island
& British Columbia, and also of Rupert's land, and the North
Western Territory. We are happy to inform Your Lordship that a
large majority of the People of British Columbia appear to be
anxious for an immediate Union with Canada. With the assent of
the Imperial Government that Union may soon be accomplished, and
therefore the Dominion of Canada has presently & prospectively
a deep interest in the Settlement of the
Boundary Question, involving the title to the Island of
San Juan in the Gulf of Georgia. We notice that the President of
the United States in his last Message announces that the title to
that Island is one of the three questions now pending for
settlement between Her Majesty's Government and the Government
of the United States. We avail ourselves of the present
opportunity to represent to Your Lordship, that in our humble
opinion, it is of vital importance to British Columbia, and
prospectively to all British North America, that
an Island
which commands the passage by Sea to the principal Cities, ports
and Harbours of Her Majesty's possessions on the Pacific Coast,
should not be surrendered to a Foreign Power.
We think it is clear that the Treaty of 1846 which establishes
the boundary "through the Channel which separates the Continent
from Vancouver Island," intended by these words, the Channel
nearest the
Continent; the only one then generally known and
used by navigators. It is the
first Channel, and therefore preeminently the one which "Separates"
the Continent from Vancouver Island. The American Government, by
contending for the
third Channel, or that which is farthest from the Continent, (the
very existence of which appears to have been unknown to the British
Commissioners) show to the world that their object is not to
secure possession of a few rocky islets in the Gulf of no
commercial or agricultural value, but of the important military
position of
San Juan,
where they may build a fortress that would lock up the Straits
of Fuca and overawe British Columbia as effectively as Fort
Montgomery, built on Canadian Territory, which was surrendered
to the United States by the Treaty of 1842, now locks up Lake
Champlain and threatens by its proximity and magnitude, the
Chief City of the New Dominion.
Our experience of past diplomacy in the settlement of Boundaries
in North America, where the disposition on the one side to
concede, and on the other to encroach, was always present and
always resulted disastrously to Canada, admonishes us that a
similar disposition and similar results may be feared in the
future. A territorial compromise in British Columbia may be
deemed by some, of little moment in the settlement of the other
questions now pending between the two Governments, but we
respectfully submit that every resource of diplomacy, and every
argument derived from the practice and policy of coterminous
nations, from the geographical position and maritime
requirements of the respective Countries in the Gulf, as well as
from the language of the Treaty, should be exhausted before a
strategic position is given up, which future generations of
loyal Subjects may have occasion to regret, as bitterly and as
unavailingly, as the people of New Brunswick, Quebec and all Canada
now regret the unfortunate Concessions of the "Ashburton Treaty."
We crave your Lordship's pardon if we have pressed our views too
strongly on what may be thought rather an Imperial than a
Canadian question. We do not doubt that the importance of the
issue is already sufficiently impressed upon your Lordship's
mind, but we cannot help feeling, when we look at the Map of
Canada, and observe that on our eastern frontier the State of
Maine, by a recent Treaty, has been thrust, like a wedge,
between the Provinces of New Brunswick and Quebec, intercepting
direct communications, and covering some 8,000,000 of Acres,
previously regarded as British Territory, and occupied by
thousands of British Subjects; and that, in the west, through
ignorance of the natural features of the Country in 1773, and
under a spirit of Concession in 1818, a vast territory was
surrendered, the boundary carried so far north, that
Communication between Canada and the great Vallies and plains of
the North Western Territory is through a region of lakes and
mountains, instead of a level plain; we say, we cannot help
feeling, when we recall these unhappy, and as we now find,
costly blunders of the past, that we are only discharging a solemn
duty when we add our earnest warning to the arguments your Lordship,
as Secretary of State for the Colonies, will use to prevent a
similar, and in some respects, a worse blunder, in reference to
our position on the Pacific Coast.
We have the honour, my lord of [illegible] ourselves
Your Lordship's
Most obedient
and humble Servants George Et. Cartier Wm McDougall
Rogers to Under-Secretary of State, Foreign Office, 13 January
1869, forwarding copy of letter and asking "what answer
should be returned to this representation" (one draft and three
final copies included).
Minutes by CO staff
I have added a few words to avoid any appearance of indifference to
Canadian interests.
Three copies of a letter set, the first one from Cartier and McDougall to Granville,
30 December 1868, and the second one from Rogers to Under Secretary of State Foregin Office, 13 January 1869.