M Adderley
M Birch has arrived.
N.B. I have given him leave of absence for three weeks to see
his friends.
But I am inclined to think that the first step
sh be to ascertain what can be ascertained in the
office as to the mode in
w this has come about, e.g.
I should like to see—what was the Revenue & Expenditure per
ann for the last few years & particularly how much of that
expenditure went in Roads & public works, or such unforseen
matters as the Indian rebellion, and also how much was defrayed by
loans & how much by Revenue.
Also, as
M Seymour says that
much is due to the decrease of the customs since or in anticipation
of Union, (the Merchants pouring their goods into
Victoria while
it was a free port, & then pouring them duty free from
Victoria
into
B.C. as soon as the Colonies were united). I should like
to see what
was the position of the Colony before that cause
operated. My impression is that they were more or less insolvent
& only went on by aid of the Bank before that time, having
inter alia remitted the Gold Tax with taking any means by new
taxation or reduction of expenditure to fill up the deficit
w
that (I suppose) had caused.
This only concerns the past. As to the future it is no doubt
true that high taxation, distress and want of assistance from home
will probably cause the American population of the Colonies to
press for annexation—a pressure w w soon become irresistable
except at a cost far greater than the worth of the fee simple of the
Colony.
On the other hand if the Colonists once find that the
annexation threat [is] satisfactory in extracting money
from us
they will plunder us indefinately by it.
I think in this state of things, that, although I do not
anticipate that HG will hold out expectations of pecuniary
assistance to
B.C. yet it
w be better to master the case
as far as possible, before answering this in order to put the
refusal on the firmest & least irritating grounds.
I suppose the question to be (in the long run) is
B.C. to
form part of the U.S. or of Canada; and if we desire to promote
the latter alternative, what form of expenditure or non-expenditure
is likely to facilitate or pave the way for it.
Sir F. Rogers
In
July last
Governor Seymour stated that the Colony of
B Columbia
would be in arrear on the transactions of
1867 by probably £45,000
& he asked for pecuniary assistance from home. He has repeated
that request in several subsequent despatches, & more recently
he has asked by Telegraph to be allowed to draw on the Imperial
Treasury to the extent of £50,000.
Now although there can be no doubt that the finances are in a
most embarrassed state, that the Colony is paying heavy interest
& sinking fund on Loans contracted in England, that it is
largely indebted to the Colonial Bank, to the
Crown Agents, to some
of its public officers, & that the Salaries of the Public officers
are several months in arrear it is of course necessary that the
exact financial condition
of the Colony should be enquired into
before the Secretary of State &
the Treasury can come to a final
decision as to whether
B.C. should receive Imperial Aid, or not.
In accordance with your direction
M Hemming & I have
been engaged during the last few days in such an enquiry, which
owing to the manifest discrepancies occuring in the financial
returns & the annual Blue Books, has been accompanied with some
difficulty.
The result of our investigations will be found in the annexed
tables showing the Ordinary Revenue & Expenditures under each
head for the last 4 years, and the amount of aid (Table No. 3) on
the one hand from temporary & permanent Loans, and of the disbursements
on the other in part repayment of those Loans,
in redemption of
bonds, & in remittances to Agents to meet the interest &c accruing on
permanent Loans.
From these tables, N 1 & 2, it would appear that
The total Ordinary Revenue during the 4 years ending in 1866 has
been |
£433,895. 5.0 |
—————
|
The total Ordinary Expenditure, including that on Roads during
the same period has been |
£588,955.19.2 |
which shows an excess of Expenditure over Revenue of £155,060.14.2.
The temporary & permanent loans raised during
1862/3 1864 & 5
have been respectively
Temporary |
£135,081.3.7 |
(Bearing 10 & 12 p.c) |
Permanent |
£200,000.0.0 |
|
Total |
£335,081.3.7 |
|
—————
|
The disbursements made for the redemption of
Bonds & repayment of temporary loans has been |
|
£125,141.5.9 |
|
Total |
£125,141.5.9 |
|
Leaving an apparent debt at the end of 1865 of
£209,939.17.10. The remittances to the Agents for interest & sinking
fund during that period were £42,109.12.6.
The permanent Loans of £200,000
were raised in
1862-3-4 under
local Ordinances for the purpose of
carrying two roads through a wild & thinly populated Country.
The last Loan for £100,000 raised in 1864 (which
only realized £95,800) was not however entirely spent on
roads. £20,000 went towards the suppression of Indian disturbances
& £10,700 to the Imperial Treasury for buildings occupied by the
Royal Engineers & for Surveys undertaken by them.
The Colony received therefore only £65,100 for the objects for
which that Loan of £100,000 was raised.
The amount which the
Crown Agents must
annually provide for interest & Sinking Fund on the
BC Loan
of £200,000 & the
Vancouver Isl Loan of £40,000 is
£24,000
(see statement prepared by me in
September last N 5.) The
account of the Colony with the Agents is annexed & shews a
deficit of £4550. (N 4.)
One of the causes for the present
depression has been the falling off in the Customs Revenue
owing to large importations of Merchandize into
Victoria while
a free port, which, after the Union were introduced on the
Mainland without the payment of any duty. This falling off
would simply be of a temporary nature.
All these circumstances
combined are stated to have caused a deterioration of over 95
per cent in the value of property, that is to say that Land which
in
1863-4 was worth £100 would now fetch at auction £3 or £4.
It is worthy of remark, as will be seen from the detailed
tables N 1 & 2, that in 1866 the cost of Establishments was
£38,000 out of a Revenue of less than £95,000. (Estab &
interest on Loans therefore absorb 1/2 the Revenue).
In the same
year in
Hong Kong notwithstanding a large increase for the Mint
Staff the Estab only cost £32,000 out of a Revenue of
£160,000—and the relative rates of Salary to the principal
officers in those Colonies were respectively
|
B Columbia |
|
Hong Kong |
Governor |
£4000 |
& £1000 allowance |
£5000 |
Col Sect |
£800 |
|
£1500 |
Auditor |
£500 |
|
£1000 |
Registrar |
£500 |
|
£800 |
In conclusion I beg to be allowed to observe that the Blue Books,
the Estimates & the Financial Returns from
B Columbia besides
being carelessly prepared, are most irregularly transmitted to
this Country—for instance the Statements of Revenue &
Expenditure & the Estimates for
1867 which were drawn up or rather
passed in
March last have only within the last few weeks been
received in this office, and they are seldom if ever accompanied by
such an explanation as would make them intelligible without a
rigid examination.
The Revenue of
Vancouver Island the year before Union was £58,000
exclusive of Loans.