Despatch to London.
Minutes (3), Enclosures (untranscribed) (6), Other documents (1).
This document contains mentions of Indigenous Peoples. The authors of these documents
often perpetuate a negative perspective of Indigenous Peoples and it is important
to look critically at these mentions. They sometimes use terminology that is now considered
hurtful and offensive. To learn more about modern terminology pertaining to Indigenous
Peoples, Indigenous ways of knowing, and decolonization, please refer to the Glossary of terms.
Seymour forwards correspondence regarding the Bishop of British Columbia’s concerns, which includes Seymour’s Executive Council being biased by local political feeling.Seymour also describes the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of England competing for
influence over Indigenous peoples in the united colony, suggesting it would be wise policy to restrict the religious and doctrinal education of the Natives
to the Catholics and prohibit by Ordinance the intermeddling of Ministers of other
denominations.Blackwood minutes his views on the efforts of Roman Catholic priests compared to Protestant Clergymen, and Rogers, Adderley, and Carnarvon, minute their support of Seymour’s suggestion, determining that missionaries [should] divide the population among them if possible, rather than quarrel
for it.
No. 22
11th January 1867
My Lord,
I have the honor to forward a letter submitted to Mr
Birch, recently Administering this Government, by the Bishop
of British Columbia for transmission to Your Lordship,likewise likewise
I transmit the draft of the despatch in which the Bishop's letter
would have been forwarded by him to Your Lordship had not my
return to the colony relieved Mr Birch of the privilege of
direct communication with you. Mr Birch explains that the
delay in sending on the Bishop's letter was caused by his having
to wait for replies to the Circulars he issued to the Stipendiary
Magistrates respecting the labours of the Church of England in
their several districts.
2.
2. As I have become the Medium of Conveyance of these papers,
it is perhaps convenient that I should say a few words upon them.
The Bishop accuses My Executive Council of being biased by
local political feeling. Possibly an impression rested on their
minds that his Lordship was not altogether uninfluenced by a
special local regard for that portion of his Diocese latelyembraced
embraced within the Civil Government of Vancouver Island.
I hardly know how I shall keep clear of a charge of being under
a similar impression when I say that the Church of England has made
more progress and has a
more numerous body of clergymen on the Island than on the
Mainland. Here, beyond the narrow limits of New Westminster
it seems to have little hold on the people. There, its influence
pervades such communities as I have visited.Mr.Mr Birch, when he
wrote, had but to consider the state of the affairs on the
Mainland. My present authority extends over the whole Diocese.
I am in a position to take a wider view and while I admit the
entire correctness of Mr Birch's statements and reluctantly
concur with the tenor of the Magistrates reports, I gladly
affirm that great progress has been made by the Church in
Victoria and several other portions of Vancouver Island.
3.
3. Without defection to the Church to which I belong
I say that that of Rome is supreme among our native population
on the Mainland—and with infinite benefit to the Indians and
to the White inhabitants of the Territory. My despatch No. 61
of 22nd May 1865, contained a description of the Catholic
Mission School at St. Mary's on the Fraser, where the Indian
boys acquire the industries of Europe and the simpler branches
of European education, Where they show that they can thrive
and do well in contact with civilization, and that there is
no reason why in this Colony, at least, the Native race should
retreat or perish before the advance of the White Man. The
same thing is shewn on a vastly larger scale on the plains
beyond the Cascade range where the Indians own horses and cattle,
cultivate in many cases their patches of land, speak French
instead of the Chinook jargon, lead healthy active lives and
donot not diminish in numbers except when the small pox is among
them. Where Whiskey selling can be stopped even the Indians
of the Coast and Lower Fraser are doing well.
4. That civilization if introduced by Protestant
Missionaries would have effected equal good I am not permitted
to doubt. But the French Catholic priests were first in the
field and they have succeeded. Whether it would be now wise of
the Church of England to interfere in any way with the fields
already occupiedby by that of Rome I am much inclined to doubt.
There is ample room for Protestant Missionary enterprise along
the coast, on our Northern Rivers, and even in Vancouver Island,
but I should see with regret in the valley of the Fraser, beyond
New Westminster, the Indians' belief in the "Bon Dieu" disturbed
by controversy.
5. Neither Church has got hold of the Gold Mining Districts.
Here is a whole scope forMissionary Missionary enterprise.
6. I do not go the length of one of our most experienced
Magistrates who seeing with alarm the Mysteries of religion as
taught to our Indians about to be interrupted by other teachers,
applies to the Colonial Secretary under date 26th December 1866,
But do you not think—if it were only possible—that it would
be wise policy to restrict the religious and doctrinal education
of the Natives to the Catholics and prohibit by Ordinancethe the
intermeddling of Ministers of other denominations.
I have the honor to be,
My Lord,
Your most obedient
humble Servant Frederick Seymour
Minutes by CO staff
Mr Elliot
Having watched, with interest, the proceedings of all
religious Sects in B.C, since its establishment as a
Colony, I cannot refrain from saying that the impression
on my mind always has been that the zeal & attention of
the R.C. priests has been most marked & effective, and
have left far behind the Protestant Clergymen. The reports
made by the Magistrates on this occasion confirm this
impression, & I think upset the Bishop's complaint to the
Archbishop of Canterbury.
I do not know that I have anything to say—except that
I agree with Mr Seymour that it is very desirable that
missionaries shd divide the population among them if
possible, rather than quarrel for it.
Documents enclosed with the main document (not transcribed)
Bishop of Columbia to Carnarvon, 22 October 1866, forwarding
letter addressed to the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Bishop of Columbia to Archbishop of Canterbury, 20 October 1866,
defining the opinion and position of the Church of England in the
colony, and disputing certain statements made by A.N. Birch, with
explanation.
Memorandum, Birch to Seymour, 1 November 1866, forwarding
draft despatch to the Secretary of State relative to the position
of the Church of England in the colony.
Birch to Carnarvon, no date, forwarding correspondence from the
Bishop and commenting at length on their contents.
Circular, D.C. Maunsell, Private Secretary, to Magistrates,
November 1866, asking if Indian tribes of their districts had received
religious instruction during the previous few years.
Draft reply, Carnarvon to Seymour, No. 3, 8 March 1867 informing
Seymour that Carnarvon has received his despatch of January 11, and
asking Seymour to inform the Bishop of Columbia he received the letter from the Archbishop of Canterbury.