I have received and laid before
The Queen the Ordinances passed by
the Legislature of
British Columbia, which are enumerated in the annexed
Schedule; and I am Commanded to inform you that Her Majesty has been
graciously pleased to sanction and confirm them.
I take this opportunity of stating that although I consider the
Ordinance No. 16 a very proper Enactment, I doubt whether the 4th Clause
will effect all that is intended by the Legislature. It will no doubt
facilitate the collection of evidence for a con
V.C.I.n under the 6th
Clause. But considering the strictness with which penal Laws are
construed, it would probably not aid a Justice in con
V.C.I.g a person of
"selling, bartering or giving" intoxicating liquors under Section 1,
inasmuch as the fact of being in an
Indian![Manuscript image Manuscript image](https://hcmc.uvic.ca/~coldesp/jpg_scans/jpg_thumbnail/rg7_g8c_12/rg7_g8c_12_00183r.jpg)
Indian's tent with spirits is not
made evidence of having given them, but only of an intention to give,
which intention is not punishable by the Ordinance.
I also have some difficulty in understanding clearly the effect of
the 7th Clause of the Ordinance No. 13, "Imposing a Duty on gold."
There seems to be some typographical error in it.