With reference to the correspondence on the subject
of the Assay Department of
British Columbia, which you
have allowed me an opportunity of perusing, I beg to offer
a few observations for your consideration.
The ordinary expenditure of the Establishment may be
assumed to be approximately represented in the return
supplied of last year's outlay on Salaries and expenses of Office.
The Expenditure on these heads during
1862 amounted
to £1886.1.6. consisting of Salaries £1650 and Expenses
of Office £236.1.6. A charge of £1848.15.9. for works
and Buildings during the same year must have arisen (I
presume) out of the preparations made for minting gold. The
Staff is limited to an Assayer,
Assistant Assistant Assayer, Melter
and Operative Melter. An additional Office, that of
Accountant, recommended by
Captain Gossett, was never
filled up. The scale upon which the Establishment was
originally constituted does not appear extravagent. But
unfortunately the revenue has proved much smaller than
was anticipated. In the same year (
1862) the receipts
of the Establishment are given as £575.12.0. Of the
whole yield of Gold less than one third is found to be
assayed within the two Colonies, by public and private
Assayers together, and of that amount again about 40 per
cent only passes through the Government
Assay Office at
New Westminster. The most unfavorable feature of the
case is the large proportion of Gold which escapes the
Colonial Assayers, being carried by the American Miners
to
San Francisco in California, where they prefer to
Winter.
Governor Douglascan can see no prospect of rendering
the establishment remunerative, or of maintaining it
without a heavy charge to the Colony. He therefore
recommends that if the Assay Department at
New Westminster
is to be retained, the staff should be reduced. He
considers that one Chief Assayer and one Assistant or
operative Melter would be sufficient to meet all the
requirement of the Colony. I beg to express my
concurrence in the propriety of the reduction proposed,
and also in the selection of the Offices to be retained.
With regard to the question of the location of
the Assay Department, I would only remark that its
position at the seat of Government is likely to conduce
to security and efficient management.