 
                  
                  
                  
                  In compliance with their Lordships minute on the enclosed letter, dated 
28th Ultimo, from the 
Colonial Office, on the subject of a claim on that Department for the sum of £98.10.0 being dead
                     freight on 20 tons of hay, &c, removed from the "
Thames City" at 
Gravesend, previously to her departure for 
Vancouver's Island.
I beg to repeat that the 
ship-
                        
                           The Secretary
Of the 
Admiralty&c& # 1 6 0 ;&c& # 1 6 0 ;&c
 
                      
ship- Brother's claim for the above named sum was in the first instance disallowed
                     on the ground that, although the stores in question were originally shipped in the
                     
Thames City, they were not conveyed to their destination.
The brokers, however, appealed against this disallowance, urging "that these goods
                     were "shipped in regular form "in the docks, & were discharged "at 
Gravesend, for the "public convenience, by the "orders of 
Colonel Moody, "& in the presence of 
Mr "King, Inspector of Shipping "at the Tower; that the 
owner
"owner at the time stated "that, as the room was "not refilled, & as he was "able
                     & willing & able to "carry the oats & hay, he "should consider himself "entitled to
                     the freight; "that he was assured most "distinctly that he would "receive the freight;"
                     and that "
Mr King could no "doubt testify that the "stores were landed soley "for the public convenience"
                     
Mr King, before mentioned, having been called upon through the 
War Office for a report of the circumstances 
of
of the case, a copy of his statement was received in 
War Office letter of 
13thAgust August 1861, in which letter an opinion was expressed that the brokers appeared to be entitled
                     to payment on account of the space left by the removal of the stores for the better
                     accomodation of the Royal engineers on board; and this view appearing to be justified
                     by the peculiar circumstances of the case, the Broker's claim was allowed to be paid.
I may observe that 
payments
payments for what is termed "dead freight" have always been allowed when stores, for
                     which conveyance has been engaged, have been subsequently withdrawn, or not shipped,
                     for reasons beyond the control of the ship-owners.
I beg further to add that it is not known in this Department to whom the Stores landed
                     at 
Gravesend were delivered, but, having been removed from the ship by order of 
Colonel Moody, it is presumed that that officer 
has
has accounted for them to the 
War Office.
The payment of ₤98.10.0 to the brokers of the "
Thames City" was made in the usual way by the Accountant General of the Navy.