Correspondence (private letter).
Minutes (4), Other documents (2).
Ffennell writes Fortescue to refer Newcastle to the Fishery Acts of Upper and Lower
Canada, as well as the Report of Commissioners of Crown Lands of Canada for the years 1857, 1858, and
1859. He warns that the salmon fisheries of British Columbia should be regulated soon to prevent
the establishment of abuses and unproductive practices, which must tend ultimately
to diminish materially if not totally to destroy a great natural source of Wealth,
adding caustically that the state of the Canadian Salmon Fisheries appears to furnish as an example fully
supporting this view of the Question.
Your letter of the 27th of March addressed to me here with
reference to the Fisheries of British Columbia, was not duly
forwarded, I have been back and forward to Ireland and thus the
delay in replying to it has occurred.
I would beg to refer to the following documents for the
information of his Grace the Duke of Newcastle—
Fishery Acts, Upper and Lower Canada, Printed in Quebec by Queens Printer.
Report
Report of Commissioners of Crown Lands of Canada for 1857.
Ditto ......................................................... 1858.
Ditto ......................................................... 1859.
(I have not yet seen Report 1860.)
These reports contain much valuable information with respect
to the Laws enacted for the protection of the Fisheries of Canada,
the state the fisheries had fallen into, and the means now in
operation for their regulation.
I believe the Salmon Fisheries of British Columbia far exceed
in extent and capabilities those of Canada, and that it would be
highly expedient to place themunder under a system of State Regulation before abuses Creep in, with the view of inducing
private enterprise embarking in their Commercial development and at the same time
guarding against the establishment of abuses and unproductive practices, which must
tend ultimately to diminish materially if not totally to destroy a great natural source
of Wealth.
The state of the Canadian Salmon Fisheries appears to furnish
an example fully supporting this view of the Question.
Mr Elliot
Frame a despatch to the Governor calling attention to this subject and
send him the reports specified by Mr Ffennell if we possess them. If we have not got them in this Office ask the Governor of Canada
to supply them.
Mr Fortescue
If we are sending papers to British Columbia about the preservation
of Salmon, ought we not to include the recent report of a Commission in this Country
which has lately attracted so much attention?
Draft reply, Newcastle to Sir E. Head, Canada, No. 103, 10 May 1861,
requesting that the reports referred to in Ffennell's letter be forwarded
to Douglas.