M Merivale
Although it may be thought proper that this Country should
foster and help the new Colony of
B. Columbia through the early
struggles of its existence I am not entirely convinced that to
subsidize this North West Navigation & Railway Canada Company,
or its rival
M Stamp, for the maintenance of postal
communication between G Britain &
B. Columbia w be
the best mode of spending money
upon it. As Lord Colchester
tells us in his Letter of the
8 March/3308/
59 that the Letters sent
from the U. Kingdom are very few (in 2884 his
Lordship says that on one occasion they amounted to no more
than 56) forbidding therefore any prospect of a revenue
from that source, and as the Governor of the Colony in his
desp of the
5 Nov/58/535 informs us that he has not
much reason to complain of the existing fortnightly mail
communication it does not appear requisite for the Imperial
Gov to rush hastily into an agreement to subsidize this
Company or any body else. It would doubtless be an immense
gain to this Company to get an annual grant of money from
England to carry its proposed scheme of a post-route to
B. Columbia viâ the
Red River and Saskatchewan Country into
effect; and, it
w be serviceable to Mankind perhaps
that that Country should be easily penetrated & opened up,
for the post might be succeeded by many enterprizing people
desirous of settling in it; but so far as Imperial interests,
or
B. Columbia interests are at present concerned I can but
think that they might both well wait some years for a subsidy.
If a war should break out with the U. States interrupting our
maritime communication
with
V.C. Isl &
B. Columbia we have
the consolation of knowing that we can still fall back upon
this overland route—so that in point of fact we are not
absolutely dependent on the
Panama route & the American Pacific
Steamers. The immediate ans, however, to this Letter seems
to me to be that
Sir E. Lytton can offer no other observations
in reference to the object of this C than those made by him
on the
7 of last March, and that he would dissuade
the Treasury
from returning any decisive reply to the C until it is known
what the
Gov of Canada—to whom
Sir E.L. made a reference
on the
13 April—shall say upon the subject; and that,
for the same reason, it would be well to defer taking any more
steps for obtaining tenders for the service viâ
San Francisco;
for if the report from Canada were favorable to the Saskatchewan
route it might supersede the necessity for forming engagements
by the Pacific route.