Kelly and Cairns provide a legal opinion on Douglas's concerns that American Owners of Steam Boats running on the Fraser River were monopolizing licences by taking out British Registers for their vessels to fictitious British subjects. Kelly and Cairns note that Douglas would have to prove conclusively that a vessel was really in whole or in part foreign-owned in order to withhold a British Register certificate from a vessel.
We are honored with your commands signified in Mr
Merivale's letter of the 8th June inst. in which he
stated that he was directed by you to transmit to us the
Copy of a Despatch from the Governor of British Columbia
reporting a serious injury to the Colony caused by the
practices of certain American Citizens who are the owners
of the Steam Boats running on the Fraser River.
Mr Merivale was also pleased to state that Foreign
Vessels have hitherto been admitted by license of the
navigation of the Fraser River, but, that the Governor
having reported that these American Owners are combining
to obtain complete right of this navigation by taking out
British Registers for their vessels by means of transfers
to British subjects which there is every reason to believe
are only nominal and fictitious, he was desired to request
that we would take these papers into our consideration & favor
you with our opinion on the question raised by the Governor
whether he would be justified in witholding a British Register
from Vessels becoming British under such circumstances as those
described in his Despatch.
In
In obedience to your commands we have taken these papers
into our consideration and have the honor to Report
That under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1854, (17 & 18 Vic.
c. 104) s. 18. no ship is to be deemed a British Ship unless she
belongs wholly to natural-born British subjects, or persons made
denizens as therein mentioned, and although by s. 56. security
is provided against the colorable or fictitious transfer in the
form of a declaration by the transferees that no person not
qualified to be an owner of a British Ship is entitled as owner
to any interest legal or beneficial in the Ship transferred,
yet we are of opinion that the Governor of British ColumbiaColumbia is
not bound to accept such Declaration as conclusive, but that
if he knows and is able to prove that the vessel really
belongs to a person not a British Subject, he would be justified
in witholding a British Register from the Vessel.
If proof be called for and a searching inquiry instituted
into the circumstances and condition of the alleged transference,
and the actual payment of the consideration, and the receipt and
application of the profits made by the Ships, the truth can
scarcely fail to appear.
We must however point out that mere surmise or suspicion of
the foreign ownership would not be sufficient, nor would the
Governor be entitled to witholdwithold a Certificate upon any arbitrary
view of the probabilities of the case. He must, if he witholds
it, be in a position to show satisfactorily that the Ship is
really in whole or in part foreign-owned.