I have laid before The
Earl of Malmesbury the Letter from
the
Colonial Office of the
9
Instant,
on the subject of the discouragement to the employment of British
Shipping in the Trade with
British Columbia which is stated by the Board
of Trade, in a Letter to Secretary
Sir Edward Lytton Bulwer
dated the
18 of September
last,
to be occasioned by the more advantageous position of American Merchants
in consequence of their exclusive right to the coasting Trade of the
Pacific seabo[a]rd of the United States.
With regard to the suggestion of the
Board of Trade that Her
Majesty's Government should renew their negotiations with the United
States with a view to
obtain obtain a relaxation of the American Laws which
regulate the coasting Trade,
Lord Malmesbury desires me to request that
you will state to
Sir Edward Lytton that he will instruct Her Majesty's
Minister at
Washington to ascertain from the Government of the United
States their feelings at the present time with regard to the opening of
their coasting Trade, without entering upon those questions of possible
retaliatory measures, the mention of which
Sir Edward Lytton thinks would
be inexpedient.
Lord Malmesbury observes that the
Board of Trade suggest that even
tho' the Government of the United States should be averse to throwing
open their coasting Trade universally, they might be induced partially to
relax the stringency of their present legislation. But when, in the year
1852, Her Majesty's Government endeavoured to prevail upon the United
States to make such a partial relaxation of their laws in regard to the
Coasting Trade, as would allow British Vessels to
trade trade between American
Ports in the Atlantic and American Ports in the Pacific, Her Majesty's
Minister at
Washington, in a Despatch of which a Copy was sent to the
Colonial Office on the
14 of January
1853,
stated that the American Government were unable to accede to such a
proposal; not on account of commercial considerations, nor from any
unwillingness to respond to the liberal measures of the British
Government, but because the concession desired would be inconsistent with
a provision in the
Constitution of the United States
that no preference shall be given by any regulations of Commerce or
Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another, and that Vessels
bound to or from one State shall not be obliged to enter, clear, or pay
duties in another. The American Secretary of State stated that nothing
less than a revision of the Constitution would be required in order to
alter the provision above quoted, and this was out of the question.