Jonson's lost plays
Ian Donaldson
The lost plays of early modern England form a large and tantalizing
group, greatly outnumbering those that are still extant. From a probable
total of more than three thousand plays thought to have been written and
performed in London between 1560 and 1642, a mere five hundred or so
survive today in printed form (Gurr, 1996, 26; cf. Sibley, 1933; Sisson, 1936; Lost Play
Database, www.lostplays.org). Jonson’s work is unlikely to reflect a
similar ratio of survival to loss, however, for he methodically
published what he judged to be the best of his plays. These included
some which had not fared well on the public stage, such as Catiline and The New Inn,
and others such as Sejanus, that had not merely
failed to please but had brought him into sharp conflict with the
authorities.
Yet Jonson’s attitude to dramatic publication was more cautious and
selective than this casual picture might suggest. He also excluded from
the canon of his published work a number of plays which are known today
chiefly by their titles – The Isle of Dogs; Hot Anger Soon Cold; Page of
Plymouth; Robert II, King of Scots; Richard Crookback; along
with the pastoral, The May-lord (see below,
1.101, 1.110, 1.230, 1.231, 5.343–5) – or through some more generalized
reference. Though Francis Meres in 1598 named Jonson as being among ‘our
best for tragedy’ (Palladis Tamia, Smith, 1904, 2. 319), for
example, no tragedies written by Jonson during the 1590s are known to
have survived. Twenty years later, having published many of his plays in
quarto editions and in the 1616 folio of his collected works, Jonson
could still report to William Drummond ‘That the half of his comedies
were not in print’ (Informations, 306). His still
unpublished comedies at this date included Bartholomew
Fair and The Devil Is an Ass – both
eventually to appear after Jonson’s death in the 1640 folio – together
with others probably commissioned by Philip Henslowe in the 1590s, such
as Hot Anger Soon Cold and other works whose
titles have not survived.
Many of these early plays Jonson may simply have judged unworthy of
publication. Most would have been put together at some speed in
collaboration with other writers from Henslowe’s team – for whose
collective talents, as Jonson’s later remarks to Drummond make clear, he
held no high opinion. His personal contribution to such pieces must
sometimes, moreover, have been slight. In 1598 Henslowe laconically
noted ‘A tragedy of Benjamin’s plot’ on which George Chapman was currently
engaged (Life Records, 17). This was evidently a scenario that Jonson
had supplied, and that Chapman was now commissioned to work up into a
full-length play. Perhaps it is identical with the sketch that Jonson
had showed to the Lord Admiral’s Men and for which he had received
twenty shillings from Henslowe on 3 December 1597, promising to deliver
the final product by Christmas (Life Records, 12). The tragedy, if it
was ever completed, has vanished entirely, along with much of Chapman’s
and Jonson’s other early work.
Jonson might have found it difficult, furthermore, at times to recover
the manuscripts of his plays, especially those of which he was not sole
author. These works were technically the property of the theatrical
company for which they had been written, and might therefore have been
withheld or mislaid by the company after performance, or deliberately
appropriated by one or other of its members. Years later Thomas Heywood
was to complain that many of his own plays, ‘by shifting and change of
companies, have been negligently lost; others of them are still retained
in the hands of some actors, who think it against their peculiar profit
to have them come in print’ (The English
Traveller, 1631, ‘To the Reader’, in Heywood, 1874, 4.5).
Accident, mischance, and the negligence of the author himself accounted
for other losses. The fire that destroyed part of Jonson’s library in
1623 took off (so he claimed) many works-in-progress, including some
that he had evidently found it difficult to complete: ‘parcels of a
play, / Fitter to see the fire-light than the day, / Adulterate moneys,
such as might not go’ (‘An Execration upon Vulcan’, Und.
43.43–5). Other losses might have been less accidental. In the
case of The Isle of Dogs, the most notorious and
fully documented of Jonson’s missing plays, there is a strong
probability that the manuscript had not been ‘lost’ at all, but
deliberately destroyed by its authors on account of the extreme dangers
it posed both to themselves and to the company for which they
worked.