<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI.2 id="panel_167_flanders">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Advanced Topics in TEI</title>
            <author>
               <name reg="Flanders, Julia">Julia Flanders</name>
            </author>
            <author>
               <name reg="Bauman, Syd">Syd Bauman</name>
            </author>
            <author>
               <name reg="Romary, Laurent">Laurent Romary</name>
            </author>
            <author>
               <name reg="Birnbaum, David J.">David J. Birnbaum</name>
            </author>
            <author>
               <name reg="Zimmerman, Matthew">Matthew Zimmerman</name>
            </author>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Marked up by </resp>
               <name reg="Holmes, Martin">Martin Holmes</name>
               <lb/>
               <name reg="Baer, Patricia">Patricia Baer</name>
            </respStmt>
         </titleStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <p>Marked up to be included in the ACH/ALLC 2005 Conference Abstracts book.</p>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <p>None</p>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <profileDesc>
         <textClass>
            <classCode>panel</classCode>
            <keywords>
               <list>
                  <item>TEI</item>
                  <item>text encoding</item>
                  <item>XML</item>
               </list>
            </keywords>
         </textClass>
      </profileDesc>
      <revisionDesc>
         <list>
            <item>MDH: Created from John Bradley's XML <date value="2005-03">March 2005</date>
            </item>
            <item>MDH: RS proofed and signed off without changes <date value="2005-05-18">18 May 2005</date>.</item>
         </list>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text>
      <front>
         <docTitle n="Advanced Topics in TEI">
            <titlePart>Advanced Topics in TEI</titlePart>
         </docTitle>
         <docAuthor>
            <name reg="Flanders, Julia">Julia Flanders</name>
            <address>
               <addrLine>Julia_Flanders@brown.edu</addrLine>
            </address>
         </docAuthor>
         <titlePart type="affil">Brown University</titlePart>
         <docAuthor>
            <name reg="Bauman, Syd">Syd Bauman</name>
            <address>
               <addrLine>Syd_Bauman@brown.edu</addrLine>
            </address>
         </docAuthor>
         <titlePart type="affil">Brown University</titlePart>
         <docAuthor>
            <name reg="Romary, Laurent">Laurent Romary</name>
            <address>
               <addrLine>Laurent.Romary@loria.fr</addrLine>
            </address>
         </docAuthor>
         <titlePart type="affil">INRIA Laboratoire Loria</titlePart>
         <docAuthor>
            <name reg="Birnbaum, David J.">David J. Birnbaum</name>
            <address>
               <addrLine>djbpitt+@pitt.edu</addrLine>
            </address>
         </docAuthor>
         <titlePart type="affil">University of Pittsburgh</titlePart>
         <docAuthor>
            <name reg="Zimmerman, Matthew">Matthew Zimmerman</name>
            <address>
               <addrLine>Matthew.Zimmerman@nyu.edu</addrLine>
            </address>
         </docAuthor>
         <titlePart type="affil">New York University</titlePart>
      </front>
      <body>
         <div0>
            <p>In the decade since the 1994 publication of the <title level="m">TEI Guidelines</title>, this important text encoding standard has seen widespread use in a variety of research and digitization environments. In some contexts, its application has become routine: digital libraries now publish huge volumes of lightly encoded <title level="m">TEI</title> documents through mechanisms which are well understood and thoroughly documented. However, in other quarters intensive research on the <title level="m">TEI</title> continues unabated. Not only are the <title level="m">Guidelines</title> themselves now being revised (with the publication of <title level="m">P5</title> planned for 2005), but applications of the <title level="m">TEI</title> to specific research areas continue to emerge, and new tools are continually being developed to support a variety of analytic and publication functions.</p>
            <p>This panel session brings together several short presentations on advanced topics in the <title level="m">TEI</title> research landscape, which reflect the breadth and depth of work currently being done in this community. The presentations include advanced markup issues, the design of the language in which the <title level="m">TEI</title> itself is written and documented, and current <title level="m">TEI</title> tools development. The panel chair will open the panel by giving a very brief contextual description of the current development context for the <title level="m">TEI</title>: the goals of <title level="m">P5</title>, the user community, and current trends in analytical use of <title level="m">TEI</title> markup. Following the four short papers by panelists (described below), the chair and panelists will lead a discussion of advanced use of the <title level="m">TEI</title> and future research directions. The goal of the panel is twofold: first, to provide an update to the humanities computing community on some important research efforts within the <title level="m">TEI</title>; and second, to provide an opportunity for a discussion of the impact and value of this research and its direction for the future.</p>
            <p>The first paper will discuss the perennial problem of overlapping markup, and will describe a <title level="m">TEI</title> implementation of the <title level="m">CLIX</title> solution, which has emerged from the work of the <title level="m">TEI Special Interest Group (SIG)</title> on <title level="m">Overlap</title>. The <title level="m">CLIX</title> approach involves using two empty elements to indicate where each element in a subordinate hierarchy (or at least, each element which overlaps an element in another hierarchy) begins and ends. These empty elements have the same name as would have been used for the equivalent <soCalled>normal</soCalled> element which has content, and use special attributes, <hi rend="code">sID=</hi> &amp; <hi rend="code">eID=</hi>, to indicate that an empty element indicates the beginning or the end of a pseudo-element (see <xptr to="http://www.mulberrytech.com/Extreme/Proceedings/html/2004/DeRose01 EML2004DeRose01.html#t6"/>). <title level="m">RelaxNG</title>, the schema language underlying <title level="m">TEI P5</title>, is perfectly capable of representing some of the constraints that would desired to validate this type of markup. However, <title level="m">ODD</title>, the abstract literate encoding language in which <title level="m">TEI P5</title> is written, cannot. A mechanism for permitting <title level="m">TEI P5</title>
               <title level="m">RelaxNG</title> schemas to perform some <title level="m">CLIX</title> validation without changing the <title level="m">ODD</title> language itself, but rather by using a slightly more complex <soCalled>tangle</soCalled> process to produce schemas from the <title level="m">ODD</title> sources, will be presented.</p>
            <p>The second paper will discuss analytical approaches to manuscript description and the use of this markup to support advanced research in quantitative codicology. Data-centric manuscript description has recently emerged as a topic of interest in light of the new opportunities provided by electronic text technology. While traditional printed manuscript descriptions have been substantially prose-like (a tendency reflected in more document-centric encoding approaches), the more analytical approach presented here (which will be adopted as part of the new <title level="m">TEI</title> chapter on manuscript description) treats manuscript description as structured databases rendered in XML. Highly structured descriptions with rich markup of all descriptive details (using controlled vocabularies wherever possible) permit users to conduct much more advanced research, for instance on the correlation between specific watermarks and specific orthographic norms, or on the resemblance between manuscripts in a given set of features. These kinds of questions go well beyond the tradition of consulting indices or searching for access points, and enable scholars to envision manuscript transmission in ways that would otherwise be impossible. This presentation will illustrate both the provisions of the <title level="m">TEI</title> MS description module and its application to these advanced research topics.</p>
            <p>The third paper will focus on designing and extending document models with the <title level="m">TEI</title>. It will present the main characteristics of the new <title level="m">TEI</title> specification platform, which is being used to describe both the documentation and technical characteristics of the next edition of the <title level="m">TEI guidelines (P5)</title>. The specification platform (also known as <title level="m">ODD</title> for <gloss>One Document Does it all</gloss>) allows one to describe elements and their attributes, through a combination of prose and formal descriptions. It also allows document model designers to refer to classes of elements, when similarity of behaviour or semantics have to be taken into account. The presentation will illustrate the new <title level="m">TEI</title> architecture by presenting the online environment (<title level="m">Roma</title>) that allows anyone to design his or her own <title level="m">TEI</title> subset and possibly extend the <title level="m">TEI</title> capacities by adding or modifying elements and attributes. We will exemplify these mechanisms in the light of the new terminology chapter that is to appear in the <title level="m">TEI P5</title> edition.</p>
            <p>The final paper in this panel will present the current landscape of <title level="m">TEI</title> tools development, and in particular the work of the <title level="m">TEI Tools Special Interest Group (SIG)</title>. It will discuss the current challenges faced by developers of <title level="m">TEI</title> tools, the genres of tools which are currently of greatest interest, the ways in which the <title level="m">TEI</title> community can most effectively assist tool developers (for instance, by contributing to a library of sample documents for testing), and the support framework provided by the <title level="m">SIG</title>.</p>
         </div0>
      </body>
   </text>
</TEI.2>