April 26, 2007 Crossreferences: Here are the two different ways of doing cross-references. They are from the same entry -?-/-p “inchoative”. Note that the format in (a) does not provide a gloss for the cross-reference. Presumably this is because the gloss is meant to be determined by looking at the entry of the word that is referred to in the cross-reference. The effect of xr is to point to the xml:id and thus the entry for the referred to word. The format in (b) does provide a gloss, but does not point to the entry of the referred to word. I assume that (a) is actually the format that we want to be following but your input is needed here Martin. (a) <dicteg> <cit> <quote>s‐√tˀa+ʔ+x‐míx<gloss>it is getting sweet</gloss> </quote> <bibl><!--[No source]--></bibl> </cit> <xr>See<ref target="tˀəx">tˀə́x</ref></xr> </dicteg> (b) <dicteg> <cit> <quote>√kˀə́tˀ‐p<gloss>rope breaks</gloss> <note>cf. kɬk'ə́t'ən ' break a line'</note> </quote> <bibl><!--[No source]--></bibl> </cit> </dicteg> Other: I worked on merging various entries which were separate in Kinkade's filecards, but which in fact all involve the causative morpheme -stu-, and its various allomorphs. More work on this tomorrow..