conclusion on markup for unattested glosses
Posted by skell on 23 Sep 2010 in Activity log
Following up on our questions from March 2010 about how to mark up unattested glosses , we concluded the following:
An unattested gloss should be in its own <seg>, have type="u", and have a following <bibl> tag identifying the editor who supplied the gloss - generally ECH:
So this:
<seg><gloss>knot</gloss>ted up (one knot) <
<gloss>tie</gloss>>
</seg>
<bibl>Y13.2</bibl>
Would change to this:
<seg><gloss>knot</gloss>ted up (one knot)</seg> <bibl>Y13.2</bibl>
<seg><gloss type="u">tie</gloss></seg> <bibl>ECH</bibl>
I will need to process these manually.