There are two groups, "argives" and "argivesVSTroy", both state the detail about how the term "argives" can mean not just people from Argos but also the Greeks fighting at Troy collectively. The question in mind is if we should keep this detail in both entries. If kept in just the ArgivesVSTroy entry, it could appropriately be used for any Argive group at Troy, whether it is the Group from Argos or the Greek soldiers at Troy in general. The benefit of taking it out of the "argives" entry could be the clear distinction between people of Argos and Greek soldiers at Troy when it is clear in the use of the term. For example any time it is the Argives involved in the Trojan war, we can use argivesVSTroy, stating it could be either the people of Argos specifically or the more general term. In other circumstances when we know it is just the people from Argos being mentioned, we can use the tag "argives" and the user would not be confused as to whether it is the people of Argos or Greek Soliders at Troy being mentioned. Wanted to see if there was outside reasoning for including it in both first, nothing has been taken out as of yet, only commented.