There were some technical difficulties today which did not allow me to connect to the server and do any editing of the 1621 sonnet. Instead, MH suggested that I compare the 1621 to the 1609 on the Mariage site to find any inconsistencies between the two. I found the following:

1) For some reason, the wallpaper with the 17th century motif that you find in the 1621 does not appear in the 1609. There's only a boring gray background in the 1609.

2) In the 1621, notes 1 and 2 only appear at the end of the document and not within the text. However, in the 1609, notes 1 to 4 appear not only at the end of the document but also within the text where you can click on each number that links to a pop-up window displaying the note.

3) This is more a question pertaining to the references rather than an inconsistency...I've noticed that in the 1621 Emily included a reference tag for each time the same word appears throughout the entire text. For instance, she encoded the word "Hymen" with ref tags every time it appeared in the text. Do we want to do this for all ref words that occur more than once or should we just encode the word the first time it appears and leave the rest?