Meeting with SD: allowed values and more date shuffling


Permalink 12:16:00 pm, by jamie, 319 words, 298 views   English (CA)
Categories: Activity Log; Mins. worked: 60

Meeting with SD: allowed values and more date shuffling

SD and I met to discuss two issues: some data oddities that I wasn't sure how to handle, and the re-shuffling of the recorder report dates.

#1: Data Oddities

We've made the following changes to the value lists (respites, crimes, outcomes):

  • Added "Stealing" as a crime in the "Miscellaneous" group
  • Removed "PledBelly" from the list of allowable respites (it's actually a judge's respite)
  • Decided that the list of judge's respites (the judge_respite family of elements) would be "Respited-Judge", "Belly-Q", and "Belly-NQ"
  • Added "NoRR" as a respite_normalized
  • Added "SelfTL" and "SelfTR" as outcomes in the "Transport" group
  • Added "PrisonRemission" and "Whipped" as outcomes in the "EarlyRelease" group

#2: Recorder's Report Dates

We also discussed a better way to handle rec_rep_start_date, rec_rep_end_date, and rec_rep_pub_date. These currently cover multiple trial_files within the same case, but, given that the dates may change for trials within one case, we've decided to move the dates to within the trial_file element. This will result in more redundant data but will also give SD the flexibility to enter date oddities. Specifically, these changes will be made:

  • Removing the rec_rep_head element
  • Renaming rec_rep_start_date and rec_rep_end_date to trial_file_start_date and trial_file_end_date, and moving them to within trial_file
  • Renaming rec_rep_pub_date to respite_rr_date and moving it to within the first respite element. This is being done because, as SD explained, sometimes a respite resulting from a trial may not be published in the 'original' recorder's report, but be delayed and be published in a later report, even though the trial dates may match those of the original recorder's report. So, blanketing each trial_file within the recorder's report with the same publication date doesn't allow for that flexibility.
  • Removal of rec_rep_notes, which, according to SD, is no longer needed.


No Pingbacks for this post yet...

Capital Trials at the Old Bailey

Simon Devereaux has approximately 10,000 records of people convicted in potentially capital cases between 1710 and 1840 in London heard at the Old Bailey court. This project will create a web-based database which will allow interested researchers and members of the public to compose queries on that data (e.g. women charged with robbery 1710-1720). It must be able to support a range of queries and produce output allowing researchers to identify trends in judicial practice over that time.



August 2014
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

XML Feeds